q2k8y-LigandScoringProtocol.txt

Name

ICM/APF 3D QSAR

Software

Molsoft ICM 3.8-7

Parameters

default

Method

CatS ligands with Tanimoto similarity > 0.6 to the challenge ligands were extracted from ChEMBL v. 2.3. They were docked and their best docking pose selected using the same procedure as for challange ligands. Best scoring docking poses for all ChEMBL compounds were used to train a APF-3D-QSAR model to predict its pKd. The resultant model was used to predict the the pKd of the 136 ligands in the challenge. Predicted value was converted to binding energy in kcal/mol.

Answer 1

no

q2k8y-PosePredictionProtocol.txt

Name

ICM Dock

Software

Molsoft ICM 3.8-7

System Preparation Parameters

standard

System Preparation Method

Standard ICM conversion procedure was used to add hydrogens, assign atom types and charges.
4 receptor structures were selected from a pool of PDBs combining the pocketome entry and the structures released in Stage 1b, based on their ability to re-dock the co-crystallized ligands correctly.

Pose Prediction Parameters

Monte Carlo search 'effort' parameter was set to 20.

Pose Prediction Method

Docking runs were executed with the above specified parameters while default values
were applied for the rest of the variables. Three independent docking runs were performed and resulting poses combined.
For each ligand, the best pose was selected by the sum of normalized ICM VLS score and normalized APF similarity to co-crystallized ligands.

Answer 1

No

Answer 2

Yes