1479-1-ifdj6-PosePredictionProtocol.txt

Name

Maestro/Omega/MGLTools/Autodock Vina Method 1

Software

Chimera (1.10.1)
OpenBabel (2.4.1)

System Preparation Parameters

Assumed pH 7.4
Gasteiger charges

System Preparation Method

Crystal ligands from the 20 structures released at Stage1b were extracted and saved separately using sdf format.

Pose Prediction Parameters

For each unknown ligand in free energy dataset, the most similar ligand from 20 crystal ligands were extracted.
Gradient descent 20 steps and gradient conjugate 50 steps;

Pose Prediction Method

The most similar ligand(template) from 20 crystal ligands released at stage 1b was identified for each unknown ligand(target) in free energy dataset. Then manually mutated the template to target and followed by a energy minimization using parameter list above. The final pose was treated as the predicted binding pose.

Answer 1

Yes

Answer 2

Yes

1479-4-q34rs-FreeEnergyProtocol.txt

Name

Laufer_Seed

Software

MELD (0.3.10)
Chimera (1.10.1)
OpenBabel (2.4.1)
Mdtraj( 1.9.1)
Cpptraj (v17.00b)
Antechamber
Tleap

Parameter

MELD distance restraint R3=0.7nm,R4=0.9nm;
MELD distance restraint enforce=50%;
REST2 solute scaling temperature range: 300-400K;
MELD replica exchange simulation time step 4.5fs;

Method

The ligands were represented by the GAFF force field, protein was represented by
the AmberFF14SB force field and TIP3P water model was used. Replica exchange molecular dynamic
simulations were performed for system containing one recept and two different ligands in a periodic
cube box with buffer distance 10A at 300K and 1 atm. The simulation weres performed using MELD
with REST2 solute scaling algorithm. The lowest temperature replica was extracted and populations of
different ligands bind to receptor protein were counted. Then the relative population was derived
based on the relative population.

Answer 1

No

Answer 2

No